The essence of Hypertext is a material indication of elsewhere. Meaning exists outside of itself, and itself is only a container of outside material. I would like to think of clicking at a web hyperlink as opening lid of word(s), an act of leading to an elsewhere strand of text that provides context to a range choice of words selected from original text. However, David Kolb’s amateur explanation of hypertext proves otherwise a prove why the subversiveness of hypertext won’t exist due to the linear sense of language. The text is a powerless exhibition of the concept hyperlink itself that nearly falsifies the notion of non-linearity and decertification. It’s still a piece of text with strong notion of argument. The choice of where to put hypertext and where not to put it proves again the consciousness of author in writing. Besides, one just expect anything non-linear out of linear essence. Language is linear, we add meaning to a strand of text by adding words to it and make it longer to read from left to right. Even though the design of hyperlinks to elsewhere, one must execute one’s action based on a linear processing of language. What’s not linear resides inside our conscious. The notion of a sentence after reading it is non-linear. One does not have to express linearly to understand what’s being understood. Thus, the subversiveness of hypertext lies not in escaping linearity, but in making it visible, that is, showing the structure of sequence and revealing the dependency.